I saw a tweet a few days ago from Tim Ferris (of The 4-Hour Workweek fame), praising Sean Bonner’s recent post on Practical Urban Caching.
The idea is that when you travel regularly to certain destinations, you
shouldn’t have to pack. If you are heading repeatedly to a certain
location, the key is to find a way to store what you need there on the
ground, instead of carrying it with you from wherever you are and then
back home again.
For example, my wife and I make several trips a year to visit her
parents and relatives near Pittsburgh. This last Thanksgiving I made
the trip with my rucksack and the small carry-all I now use. Even with
this light load, however, I was itching. I wanted to go lighter.
Bonner’s caching concept fits the bill perfectly, and the next time
Kira and I head north I will have packed a bag specifically to be left
behind at her folk’s house when we return to Memphis.
A few months back, REI had a
clearance sale and I stocked up on duplicates of some of the pants and
shirts that I like, so I already have some extras I could use as a basic
wardrobe to build on. Most of the trips we make are 2 – 4 days, so a
couple extra shirts and one extra pair of pants on-site should do the
trick. I’ll need to stock a couple extra pairs of underwear and
undershirts, and get the toiletries and such figured out. What this
means, ultimately, is that I will be able to get on the plane without a
bag, and not feel the pinch one bit. Heaven.
Bonner does raise an important issue, however: What about cities and
locales where one doesn’t have the benefit of parents or friends to
stash the cache between trips? An interesting solution came in the
comments to the post. A reader named Marc Nathan wrote about a company
he had worked with as a startup called SpareFoot.com.
The company is designed to help broker arrangements between folks who
have storage space (of all types and sizes – from large warehouses to
the corner of an attic) and folks who need storage space. Nathan
suggested that, though the service had not been specifically designed
for urban caching applications, that this was a perfect use of SpareFoot. (Addendum: it looks like another reader has taken this idea and parleyed it into a potential business venture.)
The downside to such an approach, of course, is that it could get expensive rather quickly.
I’ve been thinking this through for the past couple days, and the
more I think about it, the more it calls for a radical approach to one’s
travel ethics. Let’s call it “relational travel” – the idea being
that, if I am going to travel to a location enough times to want to
cache something there, then I better darn well be meeting people
and building relationships on the ground such that someone would let me
stash a bag at their place for retrieval on my next visit.
This means traveling less like a tourist and more like a human
being. It’s a style of travel I have long seen work well for some of my
good friends (one in particular
has spent major portions of the past few years exploring Korea and
Thailand, moving slowly and living cheaply, and building networks of
friends and acquaintances along the way. I have been with him when he
has struck up conversations with perfect strangers on the street or in a
restaurant. Not in a creepy way, either. Just human and friendly. I
am convinced that, through practice, he has learned the art of being
able to talk to anybody).
Caching is a practical reason, therefore, for the type of
“experiential travel” practices preached by folks like Greg Sullivan and
Joe Diaz over at AFAR
magazine. Think about it this way: the stronger a connection you make
with people over time, the lighter your load when you travel.
Now that’s a goal worth working toward.
No comments:
Post a Comment